Head to head · October 2026
Vivo X200 FE vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Vivo X200 FE and the Xiaomi 14 Ultra
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Vivo X200 FE529 JOD | Xiaomi 14 Ultra529 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 529 (estimate) | 529 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Dimensity 9300+ | Snapdragon 8 Gen3 |
| Performance index | 86/100 | 89/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB+ | 512GB |
| Display | 6.31" AMOLED 1.5K | 6.73" AMOLED 2K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+50+8 MP | 50+50+50+50 MP |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery | 6,500 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 90 W | 90 W |
| Release period | June 2025 | February 2024 |
Who is the Vivo X200 FE for, and who is the Xiaomi 14 Ultra for?
Price: about the same (JOD 529) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: Dimensity 9300+ vs Snapdragon 8 Gen3 — practically the same tier on our index (86 and 89/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Vivo X200 FE: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Xiaomi 14 Ultra: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Battery: the Vivo X200 FE has 1,500 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Vivo X200 FE 50+50+8 MP (3 lenses) vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra 50+50+50+50 MP (4 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 529) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Dimensity 9300+ vs Snapdragon 8 Gen3 — practically the same tier on our index (86 and 89/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Vivo X200 FE: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Xiaomi 14 Ultra: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Battery: the Vivo X200 FE has 1,500 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Vivo X200 FE 50+50+8 MP (3 lenses) vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra 50+50+50+50 MP (4 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 529) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.