Head to head · October 2026
Vivo iQOO 13 vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Vivo iQOO 13 and the Xiaomi 14 Ultra
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Vivo iQOO 13529 JOD | Xiaomi 14 Ultra529 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 529 (estimate) | 529 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Snapdragon 8 Gen3 |
| Performance index | 94/100 | 89/100 |
| RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
| Base storage | 256GB+ | 512GB |
| Display | 6.82" AMOLED 2K | 6.73" AMOLED 2K |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+50+50 MP | 50+50+50+50 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Battery | 6,000 mAh | 5,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 120 W | 90 W |
| Release period | October 2024 | February 2024 |
Who is the Vivo iQOO 13 for, and who is the Xiaomi 14 Ultra for?
Price: about the same (JOD 529) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Vivo iQOO 13 has a higher specification-based index (94 vs 89/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Vivo iQOO 13: AMOLED 2K, 144 Hz; Xiaomi 14 Ultra: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 120 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo iQOO 13 has 1,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Vivo iQOO 13 50+50+50 MP (3 lenses) vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra 50+50+50+50 MP (4 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 529), so price does not decide it — the Vivo iQOO 13 is higher on the chipset index (94 vs 89/100); the Xiaomi 14 Ultra makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: the Vivo iQOO 13 has a higher specification-based index (94 vs 89/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Vivo iQOO 13: AMOLED 2K, 144 Hz; Xiaomi 14 Ultra: AMOLED 2K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 120 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo iQOO 13 has 1,000 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Vivo iQOO 13 50+50+50 MP (3 lenses) vs Xiaomi 14 Ultra 50+50+50+50 MP (4 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 529), so price does not decide it — the Vivo iQOO 13 is higher on the chipset index (94 vs 89/100); the Xiaomi 14 Ultra makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.