Head to head · October 2026
Oppo Find X9 Pro vs Vivo X300 Pro in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Oppo Find X9 Pro and the Vivo X300 Pro
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Oppo Find X9 Pro999 JOD | Vivo X300 Pro999 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 999 (estimate) | 999 (estimate) |
| Chipset | Dimensity 9500 | Dimensity 9500 |
| Performance index | 97/100 | 97/100 |
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Base storage | 512GB | 512GB |
| Display | 6.78" AMOLED 1.5K | 6.78" LTPO AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+200+50 MP | 50+200+50 MP |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 7,500 mAh | 6,510 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 80 W | 90 W |
| Release period | October 2025 | September 2025 |
Who is the Oppo Find X9 Pro for, and who is the Vivo X300 Pro for?
Price: about the same (JOD 999) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: Dimensity 9500 vs Dimensity 9500 — practically the same tier on our index (97 and 97/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Oppo Find X9 Pro: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Vivo X300 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 80 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Oppo Find X9 Pro has 990 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Oppo Find X9 Pro 50+200+50 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo X300 Pro 50+200+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 999) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Dimensity 9500 vs Dimensity 9500 — practically the same tier on our index (97 and 97/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Oppo Find X9 Pro: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Vivo X300 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 80 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Oppo Find X9 Pro has 990 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Oppo Find X9 Pro 50+200+50 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo X300 Pro 50+200+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 999) and a similar chipset tier — the decision comes down to rows in the table: display, battery capacity, camera setup and platform.
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.