Head to head · October 2026

Honor Magic V3 vs Vivo X300 Pro in Jordan

A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.

Spec differences between the Honor Magic V3 and the Vivo X300 Pro

The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.

Honor Magic V3999 JODVivo X300 Pro999 JOD
Price (JOD)999 (estimate)999 (estimate)
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen3Dimensity 9500
Performance index89/10097/100
RAM12 GB16 GB
Base storage512GB512GB
Display7.92" Foldable OLED6.78" LTPO AMOLED 1.5K
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Rear camera50+40+20 MP50+200+50 MP
Front camera20 MP50 MP
Battery5,150 mAh6,510 mAh
Rated charging power66 W90 W
Release periodAugust 2024September 2025

Who is the Honor Magic V3 for, and who is the Vivo X300 Pro for?

Price: about the same (JOD 999) — estimate/estimate.
Chipset: the Vivo X300 Pro has a higher specification-based index (97 vs 89/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Honor Magic V3: Foldable OLED, 120 Hz; Vivo X300 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 66 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo X300 Pro has 1,360 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Honor Magic V3 50+40+20 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo X300 Pro 50+200+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Form factor: the Honor Magic V3 is a foldable (a larger inner screen when open — 7.92-inch — with a visible crease); the Vivo X300 Pro is a single-screen phone (6.78-inch). We have no weight or thickness data in the catalog, so we do not judge those.
Who is it for? Same price (JOD 999), so price does not decide it — the Vivo X300 Pro is higher on the chipset index (97 vs 89/100); the Honor Magic V3 makes sense if another row matters more to you (display, battery capacity, camera setup, platform).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.

Related comparisons

All ready-made comparisons