Head to head · October 2026

Vivo X Fold5 vs Vivo X300 Pro in Jordan

A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.

Vivo X Fold5Vivo X Fold51,049 JODVSPrice gap: JOD 50 (≈ $70)Vivo X300 ProVivo X300 Pro999 JOD

Spec differences between the Vivo X Fold5 and the Vivo X300 Pro

The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.

Vivo X Fold51,049 JODVivo X300 Pro999 JOD
Price (JOD)1,049 (estimate)999 (estimate)
ChipsetSnapdragon 8 Gen3Dimensity 9500
Performance index88/10097/100
RAM16 GB16 GB
Base storage512GB512GB
Display8.03" Foldable AMOLED6.78" LTPO AMOLED 1.5K
Refresh rate120 Hz120 Hz
Rear camera50+50+50 MP50+200+50 MP
Front camera32 MP50 MP
Battery6,000 mAh6,510 mAh
Rated charging power80 W90 W
Release periodJune 2025September 2025

Who is the Vivo X Fold5 for, and who is the Vivo X300 Pro for?

Price: the Vivo X300 Pro is JOD 50 cheaper (999 vs 1,049) — the Vivo X300 Pro price is an estimate figure and the Vivo X Fold5 price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: the Vivo X300 Pro has a higher specification-based index (97 vs 88/100). This is a chipset-class comparison, not measured gaming performance.
Display: Vivo X Fold5: Foldable AMOLED, 120 Hz; Vivo X300 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Charging: rated power is 80 W vs 90 W; these are not charging times. Check the included charger and supported protocol: peak power is not maintained throughout charging.
Battery: the Vivo X300 Pro has 510 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Camera: Vivo X Fold5 50+50+50 MP (3 lenses) vs Vivo X300 Pro 50+200+50 MP (3 lenses). The numbers describe the setup (zoom/wide), not image quality — sensor and processing matter more, and we have not tested them.
Form factor: the Vivo X Fold5 is a foldable (a larger inner screen when open — 8.03-inch — with a visible crease); the Vivo X300 Pro is a single-screen phone (6.78-inch). We have no weight or thickness data in the catalog, so we do not judge those.
Who is it for? The Vivo X300 Pro is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Vivo X Fold5 (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Swap a phone: Vivo X Fold5 Vivo X300 Pro
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.

Related comparisons

All ready-made comparisons