Head to head · October 2026
Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra in Jordan
A head-to-head spec comparison in JOD — below the table is a conditional take: who each phone suits and which trade-offs matter, rather than one verdict for everyone.
Spec differences between the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The table uses published specs and the price status documented on each phone page (observed = from dated OpenSooq listings for new units, estimate = unverified). We have not tested either phone — a higher camera or battery number does not necessarily mean a better result.
| Vivo X300 Pro999 JOD | Xiaomi 17 Ultra839 JOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price (JOD) | 999 (estimate) | 839 (observed) |
| Chipset | Dimensity 9500 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen5 |
| Performance index | 97/100 | 98/100 |
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Base storage | 512GB | 512GB+ |
| Display | 6.78" LTPO AMOLED 1.5K | 6.9" AMOLED 1.5K |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Rear camera | 50+200+50 MP | 50+200+50 MP |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Battery | 6,510 mAh | 6,000 mAh |
| Rated charging power | 90 W | 90 W |
| Release period | September 2025 | January 2026 |
Who is the Vivo X300 Pro for, and who is the Xiaomi 17 Ultra for?
Price: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is JOD 160 cheaper (839 vs 999) — the Xiaomi 17 Ultra price is an observed figure and the Vivo X300 Pro price is an estimate figure.
Chipset: Dimensity 9500 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen5 — practically the same tier on our index (97 and 98/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Vivo X300 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Xiaomi 17 Ultra: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Battery: the Vivo X300 Pro has 510 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Who is it for? The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Vivo X300 Pro (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Chipset: Dimensity 9500 vs Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen5 — practically the same tier on our index (97 and 98/100, derived from the chipset class, not from testing).
Display: Vivo X300 Pro: LTPO AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz; Xiaomi 17 Ultra: AMOLED 1.5K, 120 Hz. Compare panel type and refresh rate for reading and scrolling; we have no measured brightness or colour results here.
Battery: the Vivo X300 Pro has 510 mAh more capacity. Capacity is not measured endurance — display, chipset and usage change the outcome, and we have not measured either phone.
Who is it for? The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is both cheaper and higher on the chipset index — it suits most people unless you specifically want something from the Vivo X300 Pro (platform, form factor, brand, or camera based on your own experience).
We have not tested either phone — this take is built from published specs and the price status documented on each phone page.
Note: Observed price = a representative new-unit price from dated OpenSooq listings; estimate = unverified reference. Specs come from official announcements; we have not tested either phone.